I probably do not have to tell you that steroid use is widespread in the gym.
You probably also know how to use drugs make a big difference in size, strength and body composition.
In addition, there is still a strong social stigma against steroid use, so most people are reluctant to admit that they are involved in the #dedication.
So they lie instead.
They insist that they are natural, but they often go further and lie about their statistics, diets, exercise routines, blood tests, and anything else that keeps people from their strangely anabolic odor.
Such games make it difficult to know who is natural and who is not.
And when this topic comes up, trolls quickly ask:
"Why do you care if someone takes steroids? That's her thing. "
To which I answer:
I do not care if people take steroids.
If you need unusually large, bulging muscles to get out of bed in the morning, I find that cool.
However, what gives me a hot case of heartburn is to lie about it in order to gain followers and sell things.
Not only is this dishonest from dishonest, it also upsets other people's ideas and expectations about their own bodies.
Because let's be honest: No matter what genetics we have or how much we Naturals strive, we will never look nearly as good as drug users.
We can certainly build a body that we can be proud of – tall, slim and strong – but we will never hold a candle to many things we see on the gram.
So, when Chuckles, the massive human child, says the secret of his killer biceps are his crappy pills, powders, and PDFs, my eyeballs roll into the back of my mind.
However, many other eyeballs are riveted and this often results in a frustrating, disappointing and disturbed relationship with weightlifting.
One that often and ironically leads to steroid use as a last resort.
Therefore, it is worth knowing how to discover fake naturals and why I wrote this article.
How to tell if someone is taking (or has taken) steroids
Sometimes it's easy to tell if someone has steroids.
If she is one IFBB per or what they look like, they are in the equipment.
Often it is not obvious. In fact, many drug users look much "more normal" than you might think.
For this reason, you need clear, empirical methods for the detection of steroid use.
Such a method – at least for men – would involve identification of wrist, ankle and body composition and subsequent use Casey Butts formula determine if its overall lean mass is above what is naturally attainable, but that is too impractical.
Instead, you must rely on more workable methods that allow you to assess a person's likelihood, including the rating of:
Your Normalized Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)
Their overall size, thinness and strength
The size of her shoulders, upper chest and traps
Your muscle separation and symmetry
Let us begin.
Use this training and flexible diet program to lose up to 10 pounds of fat in just 30 days and build muscle – without starving yourself or living in the gym.
1. You have a normalized FFMI of 25 or more
The Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI) is a measure of how much muscle you have per height unit.
A normalized FFMI is a version of the FFMI measurement that can better account for elevation differences between two people (which may make some people look more or less jacked up than they actually are).
This is calculated by dividing your fat-free mass in kilograms by your height in square meters. You can enter your height, weight and body fat percentage in this calculator:
Since there is a correlation between size and potential muscle and personal organ weight does not vary widely, it is expected that higher average FFMIs will be unreachable for steroid users than for non-users and for steroid users who are simple, higher FFMIs.
And that's exactly what research has shown.
A good example of this is a study conducted by scientists at McLean Hospital who calculated the FFMIs of 157 male athletes (some said they took steroids, others gave the Natty status) and found that steroid users had an average FFMI of 24.8 while the alleged Non-users had an average of 21.8. Another important finding was that not a single natural participant had an FFMI over 25, while many "augmented" participants did.
As a result, many people have declared 25 to be the FFMI cap for natural (male) weightlifters. (There are no similar studies on women, but it is fair to assume that their upper limit is significantly lower.)
An important limitation is that FFMI does not take into account height differences. The bigger the person, the wider and thicker they are. If you look at the data in the study, you will find that the larger athletes naturally had higher FFMIs, regardless of how much muscle they had gained through training.
In other words, FFMI increases with height, regardless of steroid usage.
The researchers were aware, however, that they normalized the data to the average size of the participants, 5 & # 39; 11. This enabled them to more or less reduce height as a potential source of confusion in determining the relationship between steroids and FFMI.
After normalizing and re-evaluating the data, the scientists found that every single natural athlete had a normalized FFMI of 24.9 or less, while about half of the steroid users had a normalized FFMI of 25 or more.
The conclusion of this study is that a normalized FFMI over 25 provides evidence that steroid is being used.
Naysayers will now refer to the bodybuilders and strongmen of the old days to discredit such an assertion. A number of these men have exceeded a normalized FFMI of 25 before the advent of steroids (~ 1940) and are therefore clearly not the true limit for natural bodybuilders.
Not so fast.
One problem with using data from bodybuilders and motorists from the late 1800s and early 1900s is that there was no official system for keeping records. In addition, these men often exaggerate their claims of strength, muscle, and thinness to attract crowds and sell tickets.
In addition, there was testosterone first synthesized 1935 and available for sale in 1937, at the time when many bodybuilders exceeded the 25 normalized FFMI threshold.
The reality is that bodybuilders of the "drug-free era" (~ 1940 to 1960) were probably not drug-free. Testosterone was not as common as it is today, but it is very likely that high-profile bodybuilders quickly benefited from it.
Even if we accept that these bodybuilders are really natural, only a small handful has crossed the threshold of 25 when we calculated their normalized FFMIs with more realistic body fat estimates. This means that about 1% of the top 1% of dedicated weightlifters of that time have achieved a normalized FFMI over 25. So why should we assume that almost anyone can do that now?
Back to our initial question: How can you tell if someone is natty based on his normalized FFMI or not? The evidence says:
If the normalized FFMI of a person is older than 25 years, it is almost certain that she is taking or taking steroids.
If a person's normalized FFMI is between 24 and 25, they will probably take or take steroids.
If a person's normalized FFMI is between 22 and 23 and has been exercising continuously for more than 3 years, this may be a matter of course.
If a person's normalized FFMI is between 21 and 22, it can also be natural.
If someone's normal FFMI is between 18 and 21, he probably does not even raise who cares? 🙂
(And remember, we're only talking about men here.) Unfortunately, there is no data on the correlation between steroid use and FFMI in women, but it is fair to assume that their upper limit is significantly lower than that of men.)
If you are not sure why I said that people with normalized FFMIs under 25 may be "natural", the answer is simple:
There are many people who use steroids with normalized FFMI levels below 25, because genetics are poor, dosing is low, training is poor, or the diet is poor.
For this reason, you need to consider factors other than normalized FFMI when determining whether or not someone is likely to use drugs – factors that you will experience as you continue to read this article.
Summary: If a person's normalized FFMI is 25 or higher, it is almost certain that they are taking or taking steroids. If they are under 25, they can be natural, but this is not guaranteed.
2. They are very tall, very slim and very strong
If you decide to become a natural bodybuilder, you will see a ghost in which you can choose two of the following three options:
You can be big.
You can be slim.
You can be strong.
What? You have never met a magic mind when you decided to lift weights? Strange.
Ok, I have not met a fantastic wizard, but my point is this:
If you want to be tall and strong, forget to be slim, and if you want to be tall and slim, forget to be strong. And let's be honest: If you want to be tall and slim, you probably can not be "tall" but rather "not small".
No matter what you do in the kitchen and gym, you'll never be able to stay tall, lean and strong in every way.
That's why jacked-up, shredded types that push massive amounts of weight pull and squat, basically dripping in steroids.
Yes, I know strength does not match perfectly with muscle power and there are people who can become incredibly strong without taking drugs, especially during an exercise.
Ultimately, however, the largest people are the strongest in the gym, and when the tallest and strongest people are also the leanest, they take steroids.
Summary: The leaner you become as a natural lifter, the more you lose strength and (to a lesser extent) muscle mass. If the tallest and strongest people in your gym are the slimmest, they're almost certainly taking drugs.
3. They suddenly became much stronger
When you start lifting weights correctly for the first time, you gain more power than at any other stage of your natural lifting career. By this time your body is overly responsive to exercise and has plenty of room for improvement. We call it Newcomer wins,
A large leap in a medium or advanced weightlifter is a major indicator of the use of steroids.
After the first few years of proper training, you're lucky enough to be able to add 50 pounds to your Big compound elevators in a single year. And if you've been training for 7 to 10 years, add 10 pounds to your weight bench Press. squat, or deadlift in one year is reason to celebrate (seriously).
How does this change when you take steroids?
Well, one study Research conducted by Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Natural Sciences researchers found that lifters with approximately one year of training experience taking steroids added 132 pounds to their squat and bench press in just 10 weeks. This is absurd and shows what difference drugs can make.
Remember that this was only due to taking a relatively small dose of testosterone. Most bodybuilders and powerlifters "stack" testosterone with even stronger steroids like Trenbolone, Winstrol or SARMs, which further boosts the results.
So, if an experienced lifter "naturally" adds 50 pounds or more to a larger exercise in a year or less, let's just say that I'm extreme, extreme, insatiable, and suspicious.
Summary: As an advanced or advanced bodybuilder, gaining strength is a slow process. If a seasoned lifter suddenly gains much strength, they probably take steroids.
4. You have a massive upper chest, shoulders and traps
Why is that a sign of drug use?
These areas of the body to have a higher concentration of androgen receptors than other body parts. Androgen receptors are special types of proteins in cells that respond to anabolic hormones such as testosterone.
If you take steroids, these receptors overdrive and cause them muscle groups develop much faster than others.
Here is a good example of this look that I drew from a steroid forum where guys talk openly about their cycles:
So, if someone looks like they're wearing football shoulder pads under their skin, they'll probably take a hefty dose of medication.
Summary: The upper chest, shoulders and traps are particularly rich in receptors that respond to anabolic medications. When these muscle groups are particularly massive, drugs can be involved.
5. They are shredded, dry and full of amazing muscle separation
It's possible to become very lean and dry as a natural athlete, but your muscles do not have the "3D" marble-like look that is common with steroid users.
For example, here's a shot of me at about 183 pounds and 7% body fat:
That's more or less the best thing I can see without drugs. And while I think I've done a good job of getting lean and getting muscle, I compare it to the following picture of a well-known bodybuilder and fitness model:
Oh, and he stays that way more or less all year long. I think I just do not have enough medication.
This is particularly evident in female steroid users who are able to maintain a very low body fat percentage compared to what most women can naturally achieve:
This level of slimming, size and separation is simply unattainable for women without steroids and fat burners Clenbuterol are often involved too.
Summary: Being slim naturally is possible, but being slim, tall and chiseled like a statue requires drugs.
6. They stay extremely lean, full and dry throughout the year
This is a consequence of the previous point.
With real education and DietingOf course, you can get lean and dry while getting great muscle separation, but you can not keep that look for long. Trust me, I tried.
The issues There are many: you can not eat enough to feel good, your training is shitty, your sleep suffers, your sex drive is falling and your energy level is at its lowest. The human body just was not meant to stay so slim.
The right medicines change everything. Suddenly, you can stay absolutely shredded while eating lots of food, sleeping far less than recommended, and pushing through exhausting workouts.
If you have good genetics, it is possible to maintain 10% body fat for men and 20% for women throughout the year. But you have to look carefully what they eat and how much do you practice?
However, staying leaner while enjoying considerable size, energy and conditioning is only possible with some "chemical support".
Conclusion: As a natural athlete, you can become very lean, but to maintain this body fat percentage over long periods requires exogenous help.
7. They have excellent overall development and proportions
Most of us have a degree muscle imbalance, It is very rare that the perfect size, symmetry and definition is found in all major muscle groups.
In other words, almost all of us fitness professionals have one or two muscle groups that lag behind in size and power. For me it's calves. For others it is the arms and for others the breast.
The bottom line is that almost no natural athlete has the perfect 10/10 size, symmetry and definition of each major muscle group.
However, this becomes common with steroid users.
Why? Two reasons:
Every cell in the body has androgen receptors, and an artificial increase in androgen levels can also grow stubborn muscle groups such as calves, shoulders and arms.
Steroid users can more easily "sculpt" their body by neglecting their strong points (which remain large) and hammering their weak points (which grow fast).
Summary: Achieving perfect symmetry between muscle groups is rare. Steroids can make things a lot easier by allowing you to work more on your weak points, which will quickly affect the rest of your body.
8. You have bad acne and hair loss
Some people are genetically susceptible to breakouts and baldness, but steroids can aggravate these problems.
This is why acne-covered chest and back and hairline lines are so common among bodybuilders, especially those that are huge, shredded, dry and full.
To hide this, steroid users often filter out pimples and acne scars in pictures they publish online, but every now and then, a righteous shot finds its way into the wild and looks something like this:
It is also common for steroid users to have unusually thick, fast-growing facial and chest hair – another side effect of the masculinizing properties of anabolic steroids.
Summary: While some of us are more prone to acne and baldness, these problems are exacerbated by drug use and may be signs of steroid use.
The conclusion, how to recognize who is smart or not
Steroids have been firmly anchored in the fitness industry for decades.
Aside from legal and health issues, one of the biggest problems caused by steroids is unrealistic expectations, especially for people who are new to weightlifting.
Many fitness influencers claim that their diet, exercise and dietary supplements are responsible for their crazy size, strength, and shreds, but steroids are often the real culprit.
Not only is this fraudulent from the ground up, it also encourages people to pursue unrealistic goals that they can never achieve without taking steroids.
For this reason, it is worth finding out who is natural or not. So you can correctly classify what you've seen online as worthy of your consideration or unworthy.
The eight safest ways to tell if someone is taking steroids are:
They have a normalized FFMI of 25 or more
They are very tall, very slim and very strong
They suddenly became much stronger
They have a massive upper chest, shoulders and traps
They are shredded, dry and full of amazing muscle separation
They stay extremely lean, full and dry throughout the year
They have excellent overall development and proportions
You have bad acne and male baldness
If you tick one of these boxes, chances are good that you have taken or ingested steroids. Reservation, my friend.
If you want to know more about how much muscle and strength you can build naturally, read the following articles:
So much muscle can be built naturally (with a calculator)
Here's how strong you can be, according to science, in a natural way (with calculators)
And if you want to learn how to naturally grow taller, leaner and stronger, start with the following articles:
The best way to stimulate muscle hypertrophy (build muscle)
The complete guide to safe and healthy weight loss
The 12 best science-based strength training programs for muscle building and strength building
If you liked this article, please share it on Facebook, Twitter or wherever you want to hang out online! 🙂
+ Scientific references
Kadi F., Bonnerud P., Eriksson A., Thornell LE. Expression of androgen receptors in human neck and limb muscles: effects of training and self-administration of androgen anabolic steroids. Histochem Cell Biol. 2000; 113 (1): 25? 29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10664066. Access on the 16th of September 2019.
Bhasin S., Storer TW, Berman N. et al. The effects of supraphysiological doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1056 / NEJM199607043350101
Kouri EM, Pope HG, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat-free mass index among consumers and non-consumers of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med. 1995; 5 (4): 223? 228. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7496846. Access on the 16th of September 2019.
If you liked this article, you will receive weekly updates. It is free,
100% privacy. We do not rent or share our e-mail lists.